Mostly, you don't know because few corporate media venues will print this information. I will print it.
"A US military plane, not one piloted by al Qaeda, performed the highly skilled, steep, high-speed 270- to 330-degree dive towards the Pentagon that Dulles Air Traffic Controllers were sure was a military plane as they watched it on their screens that morning. Only a military aircraft, not a civilian plane flown by al Qaeda, would have given off the "Friendly" signal needed to disable the Pentagon's anti-aircraft missile batteries as it approached the building. Only the US military, not al Qaeda, had the ability to break all of its Standard Operating Procedures to paralyze its own emergency response systems on 9/11."
Barbara Honegger, who served as Special Assistant to the Chief Domestic Policy Adviser to President Ronald Reagan and as a White House Policy Analyst. "The US military and intelligence community, not al Qaeda, had the sustained access weeks before 9/11 to also plant controlled demolition charges throughout the superstructures of WTC 1 and WTC 2, and in WTC 7, which brought down all three buildings on 9/11," she wrote.
Source:
http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera_alan_mil_071202_seven_senior_republi.htm
Their source:
http://physics911.net/pdf/honegger.pdf
Honegger is a HIGH LEVEL analyst who is also Conservative. "White House Policy Analyst" is not an underling position, but a person who has the President's ear. That she served directly under Reagans White House staff officers indicates just HOW conservative she is.
This is not a liberal wing nut.
Neither are any of the others mentioned in this article. Col. Ronald D. Ray, and Morton Goulder are perhaps the highest profile people to ever call Shenanigans on ANYTHING. These people had Presidential security clearances. That means two things: They were privileged to this and other security information, and they were highly trusted and competent GOP PARTY members.
Agents of the US government have committed Treason against the People of America, and have attacked the United States using military tactics and equipment. This is a call to arms, people.
This is not a joke. This is not wishful thinking, or liberal bias, or any of that. This is revolution.
Wednesday, January 27, 2010
Tuesday, January 26, 2010
Open Letter to Obama - as sent to the White House.
You can't let O'keefe get off scott free. Pun intended.
Criminal acts are criminal acts. Ignorance is no excuse. GOP threw the book at Clinton and anyone else who got in their way. Now the GOP is caught committing crimes to frame innocent people.
I think this is a RICO case involving more than just O'keefe. These GOP spooks like to talk like they are working alone, but the GOP has shown its hand many times in the past as a group willing to commit terrorism to get its way.
If the FBI and CIA don't look into this, then Democrats will have proved themselves to be gullible idiots just like the GOP says they are.
Do the democrats have a spine, or not? Stop backing down. Break the fillibuster. I want health care. Stop the war.
Or don't, and I'll just give America the finger and move to Canada. Your choice, sir.
D************[edited]
US Navy veteran.
Criminal acts are criminal acts. Ignorance is no excuse. GOP threw the book at Clinton and anyone else who got in their way. Now the GOP is caught committing crimes to frame innocent people.
I think this is a RICO case involving more than just O'keefe. These GOP spooks like to talk like they are working alone, but the GOP has shown its hand many times in the past as a group willing to commit terrorism to get its way.
If the FBI and CIA don't look into this, then Democrats will have proved themselves to be gullible idiots just like the GOP says they are.
Do the democrats have a spine, or not? Stop backing down. Break the fillibuster. I want health care. Stop the war.
Or don't, and I'll just give America the finger and move to Canada. Your choice, sir.
D************[edited]
US Navy veteran.
Sunday, January 24, 2010
OMG! Art that offends me! I must post on wikidot.
Just in case anyone is wondering, that was sarcasm.
Art is art. If it offends you, it's probably art. If you hate something just because it exists, or want to smash the author, then it's almost certainly art. Apparently the tools at wikidot have little better to do than WhiteKnight for Christian Offensiveness Police and the Feminazi Fools, also known as the FF, which I can only abbreviate here.
The first three "reviews" by this wiki site give one pause. This explains why wiki sucks so hard. This explains why no professor wants to allow students to quote wiki as a source. It also is a beautiful example of just how damn stupid some liberals are. Hey, I'm a liberal, so there. They piss me off, m'kay? Spineless jellyfish, afraid of anything remotely intelligent, edgy, or funny, they're best at bending over for republicans and fascists.
These hit-pieces are portrayed as reviews, when really it's just hate speech. How dare anyone, male or female, draw women in any way that we can object to - that appears to be the primary theme of every complaint ... I mean review on wikidot.
Without any artistic skill themselves, these morons have taken it upon themselves to rate artists for such insanely vapid things as 'sensitivity to women' and 'human rights.' Yes, because comic book artists are so well known for their ovens, genocide, and killing of harmless princesses that are only riding daddies ponies for the afternoon and dressing up like barbies at the age of forty.
Sorry, I toggled the sarcasm switch to turbo.
Wapsi Square is one of the comics they 'review', and this is one of several comics which makes it quite clear that these FFs just like to hate. They don't care that they're villifying a feminist. Wapsi is drawn by a man who has such respect for women that he portrays them as highly intelligent, independent, powerful, and barely even neurotic persons with male counterparts who are virtually helpless without them. That's pretty damn feminist in my book. I can't see what the hell the FFs on wikidot are objecting too... until I read further down.
The skinny waists. THAT'S IT! In several reviews they also gripe about "unnatural" figures of women. So, apparently, if you're Feminist, you have to be a big fattie. Beach ball shape, or at a minimum, a pear. Sorry, all Native American, African, Asian, and Northern European women - you are not natural. You can't be skinny, thin, have firm breasts, and be feminist. That's the main thrust of wikidot's arguments by their cadre of Feminazis.
Being as Wapsi is based on REAL WOMEN [if the FFs had read much, assuming they can really read], if they had any brains they'd have noticed that the creator is paying homage to dear friends and even ex girlfriends. The star of the comic is his ex. I hardly entertain such gracious and generous thoughts about MY ex, I can assure you. Hot death comes to mind first, under a slowly grinding train car derailing into her cheap car and cheap boyfriend, where she tastes her own blood mixed with fuel... but I digress.
Wapsi Square is, as most of the other assailed comics on wikidot, completely harmless and not at all offensive. It's pretty much work safe no matter who you work for. Even Disney would be unlikely to have a problem with this comic. There's not much to 'tame down' or censor. Nothing, really, that I can find in it that is gratuitous, insulting, demeaning, or even failing to be respectful. There is zero nudity, humor is woman to woman or with the male as the victim, and the only character who gets mistreated is a little male troll demon. I'd characterize that as a simile for penis on any day.
Though I am far from a huge fan of Wapsi, it is slow and hard to follow, with story lines that just don't interest me, I just can't find that any of the other complaints about it are even the slightest bit true. Beware of wiki, lesson one. Beware of wiki people who blog self-righteously without cause, or rally against some invisible enemy that's not out to get them. These FFs on wikidot are the "Birthers" of the comic world.
I'm rarely so annoyed by plain stupidity as I am with the FFs. They damage their own gender in a blind rage, because the one thing that they really can't stand is a woman who doesn't look like them. Fat.
I've got a few pounds of my own, but I don't hate good looking men, because that'd be insane. It's no ones fault but my own how I look, that and good old genetics which can only be blamed on my parents. That won't do any good to complain about because I'm glad I was born. I don't hate my parents, although I could - they are racists, and I don't hate myself. I just work out more and shop more carefully. Hey, I lost an inch this winter. Yay me.
Women in America are insane by most standards, when it comes to this Feminism stuff. Look ladies, you've been equal for at least 60 years now. None of you are likely to have been alive when women could not vote or work a "man's" job. You can do whatever the hell you want to, and we'll happily cheer you on! There simply IS no repression. My girlfriend is a highly intelligent engineer. I think she rocks. But, she's not a feminist. She's a humanist. "It's not right to put one sex before the other."
I think that sums it up pretty well. Thanks, honey.
Art is art. If it offends you, it's probably art. If you hate something just because it exists, or want to smash the author, then it's almost certainly art. Apparently the tools at wikidot have little better to do than WhiteKnight for Christian Offensiveness Police and the Feminazi Fools, also known as the FF, which I can only abbreviate here.
The first three "reviews" by this wiki site give one pause. This explains why wiki sucks so hard. This explains why no professor wants to allow students to quote wiki as a source. It also is a beautiful example of just how damn stupid some liberals are. Hey, I'm a liberal, so there. They piss me off, m'kay? Spineless jellyfish, afraid of anything remotely intelligent, edgy, or funny, they're best at bending over for republicans and fascists.
These hit-pieces are portrayed as reviews, when really it's just hate speech. How dare anyone, male or female, draw women in any way that we can object to - that appears to be the primary theme of every complaint ... I mean review on wikidot.
Without any artistic skill themselves, these morons have taken it upon themselves to rate artists for such insanely vapid things as 'sensitivity to women' and 'human rights.' Yes, because comic book artists are so well known for their ovens, genocide, and killing of harmless princesses that are only riding daddies ponies for the afternoon and dressing up like barbies at the age of forty.
Sorry, I toggled the sarcasm switch to turbo.
Wapsi Square is one of the comics they 'review', and this is one of several comics which makes it quite clear that these FFs just like to hate. They don't care that they're villifying a feminist. Wapsi is drawn by a man who has such respect for women that he portrays them as highly intelligent, independent, powerful, and barely even neurotic persons with male counterparts who are virtually helpless without them. That's pretty damn feminist in my book. I can't see what the hell the FFs on wikidot are objecting too... until I read further down.
The skinny waists. THAT'S IT! In several reviews they also gripe about "unnatural" figures of women. So, apparently, if you're Feminist, you have to be a big fattie. Beach ball shape, or at a minimum, a pear. Sorry, all Native American, African, Asian, and Northern European women - you are not natural. You can't be skinny, thin, have firm breasts, and be feminist. That's the main thrust of wikidot's arguments by their cadre of Feminazis.
Being as Wapsi is based on REAL WOMEN [if the FFs had read much, assuming they can really read], if they had any brains they'd have noticed that the creator is paying homage to dear friends and even ex girlfriends. The star of the comic is his ex. I hardly entertain such gracious and generous thoughts about MY ex, I can assure you. Hot death comes to mind first, under a slowly grinding train car derailing into her cheap car and cheap boyfriend, where she tastes her own blood mixed with fuel... but I digress.
Wapsi Square is, as most of the other assailed comics on wikidot, completely harmless and not at all offensive. It's pretty much work safe no matter who you work for. Even Disney would be unlikely to have a problem with this comic. There's not much to 'tame down' or censor. Nothing, really, that I can find in it that is gratuitous, insulting, demeaning, or even failing to be respectful. There is zero nudity, humor is woman to woman or with the male as the victim, and the only character who gets mistreated is a little male troll demon. I'd characterize that as a simile for penis on any day.
Though I am far from a huge fan of Wapsi, it is slow and hard to follow, with story lines that just don't interest me, I just can't find that any of the other complaints about it are even the slightest bit true. Beware of wiki, lesson one. Beware of wiki people who blog self-righteously without cause, or rally against some invisible enemy that's not out to get them. These FFs on wikidot are the "Birthers" of the comic world.
I'm rarely so annoyed by plain stupidity as I am with the FFs. They damage their own gender in a blind rage, because the one thing that they really can't stand is a woman who doesn't look like them. Fat.
I've got a few pounds of my own, but I don't hate good looking men, because that'd be insane. It's no ones fault but my own how I look, that and good old genetics which can only be blamed on my parents. That won't do any good to complain about because I'm glad I was born. I don't hate my parents, although I could - they are racists, and I don't hate myself. I just work out more and shop more carefully. Hey, I lost an inch this winter. Yay me.
Women in America are insane by most standards, when it comes to this Feminism stuff. Look ladies, you've been equal for at least 60 years now. None of you are likely to have been alive when women could not vote or work a "man's" job. You can do whatever the hell you want to, and we'll happily cheer you on! There simply IS no repression. My girlfriend is a highly intelligent engineer. I think she rocks. But, she's not a feminist. She's a humanist. "It's not right to put one sex before the other."
I think that sums it up pretty well. Thanks, honey.
Saturday, January 16, 2010
Rusty Con
Listening to the teens at the convention, I am reminded of how far outside the normal adult society I live simply because I don't drink. They're telling me stuff that I was thinking about at various times, but also bringing up a lot of on topic stuff about the con. It's fascinating to see their fully adult minds already working on social problems and addressing how they want their lives to be. They complain about parents of course, and being bored, so we're talking about how to make the con better for those who are here more or less involuntarily.
Treasure hunts in a pirate theme, game rooms with consoles and computers instead of boxes of old board games, panel rooms with build-it activities, and more things that are spaced out around the entire hotel. That last one is what surprised me. I had not even considered that these teens want to move about, be active, and hate being crowded into one place with all the older people.
Yet again I am so happy that I have never been a hard drinking or partying kind of guy. I just gained a whole lot of insight into what it is to be a teen in 2010. Fun times.
~D
Thursday, January 7, 2010
Lies in the Media - Employment is not improving.
"STRONG HEALING SIGNS" touts a reuters.com article, written in mud.
What is healing? Apparently, people falling off of unemployment benefits by the tens of thousands is "healing." Continued losses in the job market is "healing." Absolutely no sign of jobs being created anywhere in the United States, that's "healing" too.
Why do newspapers and media lie so boldly? They are corporate empires, a network of empires that together pretty much own congress, and thus there seems to be some sort of motivation for them to falsify the news and defraud the American public. Congress is the highest form of a lie, after all, turning double-speak into an art.
Also, "healing" includes two more waves of foreclosures that are expected, a potential default of the US Dollar, and the militarization of our national police forces. Welcome to the USSA, Comrade.
Please enjoy your stay, because you won't be able to leave.
What is healing? Apparently, people falling off of unemployment benefits by the tens of thousands is "healing." Continued losses in the job market is "healing." Absolutely no sign of jobs being created anywhere in the United States, that's "healing" too.
Why do newspapers and media lie so boldly? They are corporate empires, a network of empires that together pretty much own congress, and thus there seems to be some sort of motivation for them to falsify the news and defraud the American public. Congress is the highest form of a lie, after all, turning double-speak into an art.
Also, "healing" includes two more waves of foreclosures that are expected, a potential default of the US Dollar, and the militarization of our national police forces. Welcome to the USSA, Comrade.
Please enjoy your stay, because you won't be able to leave.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)